Skip to content

Comments

refactor: move KServe tests from apps to tests/gh-actions#3120

Merged
google-oss-prow[bot] merged 6 commits intokubeflow:masterfrom
madmecodes:refactor/reorder-kserve-test-directory
Apr 30, 2025
Merged

refactor: move KServe tests from apps to tests/gh-actions#3120
google-oss-prow[bot] merged 6 commits intokubeflow:masterfrom
madmecodes:refactor/reorder-kserve-test-directory

Conversation

@madmecodes
Copy link
Contributor

✏️ Summary of Changes

This PR centralizes all KServe testing code by:

  1. Moving Python test files from apps/kserve/tests/ to tests/gh-actions/kserve/
  2. Creating a new tests/gh-actions/test_kserve.sh script that handles setup
  3. Updating workflow file to use the new test organization

This refactoring aligns KServe tests with the project's established patterns,
reduces code duplication, and makes tests more maintainable.

📦 Dependencies

none

🐛 Related Issues

#3101 (comment)
#3098 (comment)

✅ Contributor Checklist

  • I have tested these changes with kustomize. See Installation Prerequisites.
  • All commits are signed-off to satisfy the DCO check.
  • I have considered adding my company to the adopters page to support Kubeflow and help the community, since I expect help from the community for my issue (see 1. and 2.).

You can join the CNCF Slack and access our meetings at the Kubeflow Community website. Our channel on the CNCF Slack is here #kubeflow-platform.

@madmecodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@juliusvonkohout refactoring is done, now i am looking into 404 path based routing and why are the test passing even with 404, shall i do path based in this PR only or a follow up PR?

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

@juliusvonkohout refactoring is done, now i am looking into 404 path based routing and why are the test passing even with 404, shall i do path based in this PR only or a follow up PR?

first you need to also adjust https://github.com/madmecodes/manifests/blob/61974d2186d3a45de192a5a3412f70ac5c128e3c/.github/workflows/full_kubeflow_integration_test.yaml#L167 and then we can merge this PR.

@madmecodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@juliusvonkohout looking forward for the feedback.

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added size/XXL and removed size/L labels Apr 30, 2025
madmecodes and others added 6 commits April 30, 2025 19:32
Signed-off-by: madmecodes <ayushguptadev1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: madmecodes <ayushguptadev1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: madmecodes <ayushguptadev1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Julius von Kohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
@juliusvonkohout juliusvonkohout force-pushed the refactor/reorder-kserve-test-directory branch from 2852b0d to e139c3f Compare April 30, 2025 17:33
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added size/L and removed size/XXL labels Apr 30, 2025
@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

Thank you
/approve
/lgtm

@google-oss-prow
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: juliusvonkohout

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit 53724ce into kubeflow:master Apr 30, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants